Monday, March 11, 2019
Malala yousafzai essay Essay
How does Malala Yousafzai adapt the features and functions of spoken delivery to happen upon specific outcomes in different outcomes?On 12th July 2013 Malala Yousafzai gave her United Nations legal transfer on her sixteenth birthday. Throughout the spoken language Yousafzai displays some(prenominal) paralinguistic and prosodic features associated with chunk situations, for example she is standing on a rostrum in the meat of the room liner the earreach with a row behind and on the side of her, she is standing up straight which creates a sense of rite and officialism. Also she greets many people in the beginning of her row m land up looking at them, making them feel special and with that she creates rapport with them. In the first part of the destination she addresses all those who turn in fought for knowledge, peace, and par, then, she announces all she wants to call up for, like, childrens fostering, to be to a greater extent specific, girls education, and gender di vision inequalities.The blurb and third comp superstarnt parts she engrosss personal anecdotes that explain what has happened to herself and she references other campaigners for human rights. The final section includes her calling upon various institutions/nations/individual people to reject oppression and damage to gain freedom and equality. During the Jon Stewart show Yousafzai and stewart display many prosodic and paralinguistic features colligate to an informal situation, for example Yousafzai asks rhetorical questions and both of them use humour and a faster pace. During the show both yousafzai and stewart argon sitting down facing each other and Stewart is leaning towards Yousafzai making him reckon interested in what she is saying and with that he creates a rapport with her. Yousafzai uses many more fillers and backtracks a lot as it is not a rehearsed script and she is speaking a different language to her first.The Jon Stewart show starts on a serious line of products as they start their conversation with when she was targeted by the Taliban, to which she replies with an e persistentated answer which is impressive because if it is broken up into other questions, each situation will attend less than it is, w presentas if she includes it all in one answer it is overwhelming for the reference and hits them with more gravity than it would pay. Jon Stewart is similarly affected by her answer that he shows through his body language, he rocks back as if toget a better look at her and blows out very slowly which work us to believe he is on awe of her, furthermore when he puts his hands over his mouth in shock.As the question progresses Yousafzai uses long sentences to get her point across and once again overwhelms the audience merely introduces humor on the middle of her answer by saying Malala, unspoilt take a shoe and hit him she is referring to what would happen if she truism a talib and he was going to kill her, this is humorous but in an y case reminds us of her honour and manipulates our emotions in her favor. Stewart uses humor to lighten the mood and end the interview on a positive note by asking, You knowI know your father is backstage and hes very exalted of you, but would he be mad, if I adopted you? this builds a blotto rapport with Malala and encourages back channeling form the audience when he looks to them and laughs.Contrasting, in her U.N. speech Yousafzai structures her speech into four different sections, which I have mentioned in the introduction, she to a fault starts off her speech stating things she wants to accomplish and what others can do to help here but the further she goes into her speech the more inclusive it becomes she starts saying this is what we have to do, rather than isolating herself from the audience she now builds a relationship with them. She also repeats the phrase Dear brothers and sisters this again builds a rapport with the audience, however, by the end of the speech she is saying Dear sisters and brothers therefore creating gender equality in her speech and challenging societys structure of listing genders.For this speech Malala wished to establish herself not as a victim of violence, but as a champion against it, for example .it is an honor for me that today I am wearing a shawl of the late Benazir Bhutto.This is a familiar reference to a female Pakistani leader, a champion of education, who was assassinated by terrorists. Furthermore, Benazir Bhutto had also spoken at the UN, and would have been known by many of those in the audience, thus creating a rapport with them. A similar summon of office staff appears later, in a tri colon This is the compassion that I have larn from Mohammed, the prophet of mercy, Jesus Christ, and Lord Buddha. This is the legacy of change I have inherited from Martin Luther King, Nelson Mandela, and Mohammed Ali Jinnah.This is the philosophy of non-violencethat I have learned from Gandhi, Bacha Khan and set about Teres a To speak in groupings of three is a classical technique, and as Malala retroverts this roll-call, she muster the presence of those leaders, alive and dead, to stand behind her on the stage, this is also many familiar references for the audience and helps build a stronger rapport with them. Malala then drops the personnel level, as she summons the presence of two more individuals And this is the forgiveness that I have learned from my mother and father. Mentioning her p bents helps remind us she is still a little girl, doing her GCSEs and not a world leader, it reminds us of her innocence and repairs her speech even more powerful. This pattern of power-build followed by drop-back to humility reappears in the fourth paragraph.Malala uses the technique of climax, where dos ar grouped so that they ascension in a sequence from small to large There argon hundreds of human rights activists,. thousands of people have been killed by terrorists and millions have been injured. Hundred s. Thousands. Millions. This rise leads the audience to see an ever larger and more horrifying amount. The next number we hear is one, she singles her self out therefore making her seem alone and isolated and by this manipulating our emotions in her favor. I am vertical one of them. So here I stand, one girl amongst many. This is anti-climax. Having construct up an image of afflicted millions, Malala collapses it all back down, to just her, one child.Malala then uses contrast to make each point seem more powerful Dear sisters and brothers, we go steady the importance of light when we see darkness. We realize the importance of our voice when we are silenced. In the same way, when we were in Swat, the conglutination of Pakistan, we realized the importance of pens and books when we saw the guns. Light and darkness. Voice and silence. These paired opposites are examples of contrast. Malala then uses this foundation to create an analogy we realized the importance of pens and books wh en we saw the guns. The wise saying, The pen is mightier than the sword. It is true. The extremists are aghast(predicate) of pens and books. The power of education frightens them. Here, the well known commonplace The pen is mightier than the sword is used to remind the argument to its next stage Extremists are afraid of education. They are afraid of women. The power of the voice of women frightens them.This is whereforethey killed 14 innocent students in the recent attack in Quetta. And that is why they kill female teachers. That is why they are blasting schools every day, because they are afraid of change and the equality that we will bring to our society. Having earlier set the argument that extremists are afraid of education, Malala then builds that argument to demonstrate the link between womens education and society, until she concludes her argument with an anecdote And I remember that there was a son in our school who was asked by a journalist Why are the Taliban against ed ucation? He answered very simply by pointing to his book, he verbalize A Talib doesnt know what it written inside this book. The anecdote provides a dramatic punchline, but also hints that the illiterate are more promising to become Taliban. If Talibs cant read, then the ultimate sword with which to coax the war against the future Talib, is to teach the children to read. Referring to how the Taliban sought to silence and intimidate her, Malala uses antithesis to deliver the voice communication .weakness, fear, and hopelessness died. Strength, power and courage was born. Strength, power and courage in the face of adversity are the key messages of Malalas speech.In conclusion, Yousafzai manages to use a range of speaking tecniques to manipulate our emotions in her favour season still delivering her message making both dialogues powerful and effective. She uses body language to convey the formality and her emotions, her pace to add power and strength to her words and contrast to m ake each point seem more grand and dominant than the last. She uses quotations and personal anecdotes to include us in her experience, repetition to make her point and morality to show her maturity and manipulate our emotions. Overall her speech is filled with strength, power and courage in the face of adversity.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment